Search This Blog

translate

Thursday, July 15, 2010

EORTC/MSG Consensus Revised definitions on fungal infection


Proven invasive fungal diseases

Deep tissue disease

Moulds[1]

Histopathologic, cytopathologic, or direct microscopic examination[2] of a needle aspiration or biopsy specimen showing hyphal forms with evidence of associated tissue damage (either microscopically or as an infiltrate or lesion by imaging)[3]
OR
Recovery of a mould by culture from a sample obtained by a sterile procedure from a normally sterile and clinically or radiologically abnormal site consistent with an infectious disease process, excluding BAL, cranial sinus cavity, and urine.

Yeasts

Histopathologic or cytopathologic examination2 of a needle aspiration or biopsy specimen from a normally sterile site excluding mucous membranes showing yeast cells (Candida species may also show pseudohyphae or true hyphae)
OR
Recovery of a yeast by culture from a sample obtained by a sterile procedure (including a freshly (<24h) placed drain) from a normally sterile and clinically or radiologically abnormal site consistent with an infectious disease process,

Fungemia

Moulds

Blood culture that yields a mould e.g. Fusarium spp. in the context of a compatible infectious disease process[4].

Yeasts

Blood culture that yields yeast (e.g. Candida species) or yeast-like fungi (e.g. Trichosporon spp.)

Endemic fungal disease[5]

Disseminated and/or pulmonary[6] disease

Must be proven by recovery in culture from a specimen obtained from the affected site, in host with a temporally related illness consistent with a fungal infectious disease process;
OR
if culture is sterile or not obtained, histopathologic or direct microscopic demonstration of appropriate morphological forms is considered adequate for dimorphic fungi having truly distinctive appearance.[7]
OR
Positive blood culture
In the case of histoplasmosis a diagnosis of disseminated disease may be established by a positive Histoplasma antigen test[8] on CSF, urine or serum by EIA, or the presence of characteristic intracellular yeast forms in a peripheral blood smear or in bone marrow.
Or in the case of coccidioidomycosis a diagnosis of disseminated disease may be established by demonstration of coccidioidal antibody9 in CSF, or a 2-dilution rise measured in two consecutive blood samples tested concurrently in the setting of a temporally related infectious disease process.

Cryptococcosis

Probable invasive fungal disease

Defined by at least
a) one host criterion
AND
b) one clinical criterion
AND
c) one microbiological criterion

Possible invasive fungal disease[9]

Defined by at least
a) one host criterion
AND
b) one clinical criterion
BUT
c) no microbiological criterion

Host factors

Host factors are not synonymous with risk factors and are characteristics by which individuals predisposed to invasive fungal diseases can be recognized. They are intended primarily to apply to patients treated for malignant disease and to recipients of allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell and solid organ transplant. These host factors are also applicable to those receiving corticosteroids and other T-cell suppressants as well as those with primary immune deficiencies
1)   Recent history of neutropenia (< 0.5 x 109/L {<500 neutrophils/mm3} for >10 days) temporally related to the onset of fungal disease or ongoing neutropenia
2)   Receipt of an allogeneic stem cell transplant
3)   Prolonged use of corticosteroids (excluding patients with ABPA) at an average minimum dose of 0.3 mg/kg/day prednisone equivalent for > 3 weeks
4)   Treatment with other recognized T-cell immune suppressants such as ciclosporin, TNF-a blockers, specific monoclonal antibodies alemtuzumab, nucleoside analogues during the past 90 days
5)   Inherited severe immunodeficiency (e.g., chronic granulomatous disease, severe combined immunodeficiency)

Clinical criteria

Must be consistent with the microbiological findings, if any, temporally related to current episode and other potential causes must have been eliminated

Lower respiratory tract fungal disease

A) the presence of one of the following “specific” imaging signs on CT:-
·         Well defined nodule(s) with or without a halo sign
·         Wedge-shaped infiltrate
·         Air crescent sign
·         Cavity
B) the presence of a new non-specific focal infiltrate
PLUS at least one of the following[10]:-
Pleural rub
Pleural pain
Hemoptysis

Tracheobronchitis

Tracheobronchial ulceration, nodule, pseudomembrane, plaque or eschar seen on bronchoscopy

Sinonasal infection

Imaging showing sinusitis

PLUS

at least one of the following:-

Acute localized Pain (including pain radiating to eye)

Nasal ulcer, black eschar

extension from the paranasal sinus across bony barriers, including into the orbit

Endophthalmitis

as determined by ophthalmologic examination

CNS infection

at least one of the following:-
Focal lesions on imaging
Meningeal enhancement on MRI or CT

Chronic disseminated candidiasis

Small, peripheral, target like abscesses (new nodular filling defects, bull’s-eye lesions) in liver and/or spleen

Microbiological Criteria

Cytology, direct microscopy or culture:

1.      sputum, BAL and bronchial brush samples demonstrating the presence of fungal elements either by recovery by culture of a mould (e.g. Aspergillus spp., Fusarium spp., Zygomycetes, Scedosporium spp.) or detection by cytology or direct microscopy of hyphal forms
2.      sinus aspirate: recovery by culture of moulds from or detection of hyphal forms by cytology or direct microscopy.
3.      Skin ulcers, draining soft tissue lesions or fissure for which both microscopy and culture are required

Detection of antigen, cell wall constituents or nucleic acid

4.    Galactomannan antigen EIA (Platelia).
a)      a single plasma or serum sample positive for galactomannan
b)      a single BAL, pleural fluid or CSF sample positive for galactomannan
6. Glucan Assay is primarily applicable for aspergillosis and candidiasis and does not detect Cryptococcus species nor the Zygomycetes (Rhizopus spp., Mucor spp. Absidia spp.)
a single serum sample positive for beta-D-glucan
7. Polymerase Chain Reaction to detect nucleic acid
Until a PCR system is developed that has been externally validated, a positive PCR result for blood, tissue, or BAL fluid for the specific fungus studied will not be considered microbiological evidence of invasive fungal disease.


[1] Append identification at genus or species level from culture, if available.
[2] tissue and cells submitted for histopathology or cytopathology should be stained by Grocott-Gomorri methenamine silver stain or by periodic acid Schiff stains to facilitate inspection of fungal structures. Where possible, wet mounts of specimens from foci related to invasive fungal infectious disease should be stained with a fluorescent marker (e.g., calcofluor or Blancophor)
[3] Individual fungal invasive disease entities e.g. proven aspergillosis require culture and identification. Faiiling this the disease is designated as proven mould invasive fungal disease
[4] Other moulds can cause fungemia. However contamination should be excluded before assigning the diagnosis of proven invasive fungal disease
[5] Histoplasmosis, blastomycosis, coccidioidomycosis, and paracoccidioidomycosis, sporotrichosis and infection due to Penicillium marneffei
[6] the medical history must be established to distinguish between a primary and chronic pulmonary infection. Onset within 3 months defines a primary pulmonary infection.
[7] Histoplasma capsulatum variety capsulatum may resemble Candida glabrata or Leishmania in tissue but can be distinguished from them by the characteristic histologic features of granulomatous inflammation and staining by Grocott-Gomorri methenamine silver stain
[8] Testing should be performed only in laboratories where the assays have been validated; i.e., clinical correlations made with results and titers, and with data available on false positive and false negative rates with the test as performed in that laboratory.
[9] provided other plausible causes have been excluded
[10] symptoms not necessary if there is mycological evidence

Wednesday, July 14, 2010

diagnostic criteria for FAT EMBOLISM

Gurd’s criteria for the diagnosis of fat embolism syndrome


Major criteria
1 Axillary or subconjuctival petechia. This occurs transiently over 4–6 h in
50%–60% of patients
2 Hypoxemia (PaO2 <60mmHg; FiO2 <0.4)
3 Central nervous system depression disproportionate to hypoxemia, and
pulmonary edema
Minor criteria
1 Tachycardia (>110 beats/min)
2 Pyrexia (>38.5°)
3 Emboli in the retina on fundoscopic examination
4 Fat present in urine
5 Sudden unexplained drop in hematocrit or platelet values
6 Increasing erythrocyte sedimentation rate
7 Fat globules in the sputum
8 Symptoms within 72h of skeletal trauma
9 Shortness of breath
10 Altered mental status
11 Occasional long tract signs and posturing
12 Urinary incontinence

Criteria for the diagnosis of fat embolism syndrome according to Gurd and Wilson

Major criteria
1 Respiratory insufficiency
2 Cerebral involvement
3 Petechial rash
Minor criteria
1 Pyrexia (usually <39°C)
2 Tachycardia (>120 beats/min)
3 Retinal changes (fat or petechiae)
4 Jaundice
5 Renal changes (anuria or oliguria)
6 Anemia (a drop of more than 20% of the admission hemoglobin value)
7 Thrombocytopenia (a drop of >50% of the admission thrombocyte value)
8 High erythrocyte sedimentation rate (ESR >71mm/h)
9 Fat macroglobulinemia

At least two major symptoms
or signs or one major and four minor symptoms or
signs must be present to diagnose the syndrome

Wednesday, June 23, 2010

group for discussion of respiratory medicine in orkut and facebook

please join group/ community for discussion on respiratory, critical care and sleep medicine in orkut and facebook. follow the link

http://www.orkut.co.in/Main#Community?cmm=92421330

http://www.facebook.com/home.php?ref=home#!/group.php?gid=232602082762

Monday, May 31, 2010

NO SMOKING DAY 31ST MAY

LETS MAKE THIS WORLD SMOKE FREE..... LET INITIATE A HEALTHY LIVING

Wednesday, May 26, 2010

ACR Criteria for the diagnosis of Churg-Strauss Syndrome

Patient is classified as CSS if at least four of six criteria are present
  1. History of asthma
  2. Eosinophilia: Eosinophilia >10% on differential white blood cell count.
  3. Mono- or polyneuropathy
  4. Pulmonary infiltrates, migratory or transitory pulmonary infiltrates due to vasculitis.
  5. History of acute or chronic paranasal sinus pain or tenderness or radiographic opacification of the paranasal sinuses.
  6. Extravascular eosinophils

Sunday, May 16, 2010

Tuesday, May 4, 2010

world asthma day..................... HOW I CAN ASSESS MY ASTHMA CONTROL

ASTHMA IS A CHRONIC INFLAMMATORY DISORDER OF THA AIRWAY. THE PRESENT AIM OF ASTHMA MANAGEMENT IS TO KEEP IT UNDER CONTROL. THERE ARE SEVERAY WAY TO ASSESS ASTHMA CONTROL. A PATIENT CAN ASSESS ASTHMA CONTROL BY FOLLOWING QUESTION--
1. HOW MANY TIME UR ASTHMA KEEP U AWAY FROM UR DAY TO DAY ACTIVITIES
2. HOW FREQUENTLY U HAVE BREATHING PROBLEM
3. HOW FREQUENT UR NIGHT SYMPTOMS
4. HOW FREQUENTLY U NEED RESQUE INHALER /NEBULIZER
5. WHAT IS UR PEAK FLOW READING
6. DO U THING UR ASTHMA IS IN CONTROL

BY ASKING ABOVE QUESTION AND SUBSEQUENT RESULT WILL GIVE IDEA ABOUT ASTHMA CONTROL. THE BETTER UR ASTHMA CONTROL THE BETTER IS UR QUALITY OF LIFE.

Sunday, May 2, 2010

emphysema in non smoker

Emphysema develop mostly in smokers however there is report of emphysema in person who does not smoke. The causes of emphysema in non smokers includes

Nutritional Emphysema
alfa-1 antitrypsin deficiency
HIV
chronic asthma
treated pulmonary tuberculosis
Drugs—injectables
             Methylphenidate
             Methadone
              Heroin
Drugs—inhalation
             Marijuana
             Toluene (glue sniffing)
Connective tissue disease
              Cutis Laxa, Marfan syndrome, Ehlers-Danlos syndrome
Occupational exposures
              Coal mine dust, silica dust, cadmium
Biological dusts
              Farmers, grain workers, wood workers, cotton textile worker
Biomass fuels
Congenital
              Salla’s disease, Menkes disease, Hypocomplimentemic urticarial vasculitis (HUVS)


ref
1 . Emphysema in the Nonsmoker. Delano S. Fabro, Jr, DO,*† and Douglas S. Frenia, MD*. Clinical Pulmonary Medicine • Volume 15, Number 1, January 2008
2 . COPD in non smoker. PJ Barens Lancet aug.2009

COOSMIC SLEEP LAB

since 2011 serving the people of north east............

COOSMIC SLEEP LAB PROVIDE ALL TYPE OF SOLUTION TO YOU SLEEP PROBLEMS IN GENERAL AND SLEEP APNEA IN PARTICULAR IN GUWAHATI AND NORTH EAST REGION OF INDIA, MOSTLY FOCUS ON HOME BASED SLEEP STUDY TEST

CONTACT
08811095389

email- coosmicsleeplab@gmail.com

welcome and disclaimer

i welcome all of you to this new blog on respiratory, critical careand sleep medicine

DISCLAIMER:

Information provided here is for medical education only. It is not intended as and does not substitute for medical advice. If you are a patient, please see your doctor for evaluation of your individual case. The web site should not be used as a substitute for competent medical advice from a licensed physician. By accessing the web site, the visitors acknowledge that there is no physician-patient relationship between them and the author. Under no circumstances will the author be liable to you for any direct or indirect damages arising in connection with use of this website.
The appearance of external hyperlinks to other websites does not constitute endorsement. The author does not verify, endorse, or take responsibility for the accuracy, currency, completeness or quality of the content contained in these sites.

All case descriptions are fictional, similar to the descriptions you can find in a multiple choice questions textbook for board exam preparation. Cases course and description do not follow real cases. Many of the images on this blog are my own. Few of them are from friends. Some of them are from textbooks/journals. I have provided references and given credit where applicable I would be glad to take off any images/posts that you think violates your copyright policy. Please post to respicriticalcareandsleep@gmail.com